Nuclear Spins in Ferromagnetic Diodes

Investigations into the mechanism of ferromagnetic imprinting of nuclear spins have revealed that conduction electrons in n-GaAs can be spontaneously polarized along the magnetization of and adjacent ferromagnetic layer. Such spontaneous spin coherence is observed most clearly in the geometry below, where the magnetic layer's anisotropy is used to keep its magnetization at a large angle to the applied magnetic field. In this case, electron spins that become polarized along the magnetization will precess around the applied field and can be detected by time-resolved Faraday rotation (TRFR).

Time-resolved spin dynamics measurements in an MnAs/GaAs ferromagnetic diode at 5 K. The figure compares spin precession signals generated by circularly polarized (CP) and linearly polarized (LP) optical pump excitation under an applied magnetic field.

The figure above shows two TRFR curves for circularly polarized (CP) and linearly polarized (LP) pump pulses. For CP pulses, spins are polarized both by the laser and by the ferromagnet but the laser signal dominates the data. However, for LP pulses, spins are not polarized optically so the TRFR signal must be caused by the ferromagnet. The -90 degrees phase shift of the LP data relative to the CP data suggests that the spontaneously polarized spins are oriented antiparallel to the ferromagnet's magnetization.

The figure below shows that the spontaneous spin coherence mimics the hysteresis of the ferromagnetic layer. The LP data in the preceding figure is a vertical linecut of this dataset.

Magnetic field-dependent spin dynamics in an MnAs/GaAs ferromagnetic diode measured at 5 K. The upper panel shows time-resolved Faraday rotation maps, while the lower panel plots spin amplitude versus magnetic field, illustrating coupled electron and magnetization behavior.

Insights into the mechanism underlying the spontaneous spin coherence are obtained by comparing different ferromagnetic materials. For example, the figure below has data for MnAs/n-GaAs and Fe/n-GaAs structures. The data show that Fe polarizes spins in GaAs parallel to its magnetization while for MnAs they are polarized antiparallel.

Comparison of spin precession measurements in MnAs/GaAs and Fe/GaAs ferromagnetic diode structures under circularly polarized and linearly polarized optical pumping. The data show magnetic-field-dependent spin oscillations at 110 K.

The opposite polarization for the two ferromagnetic materials is also manifest in nuclear imprinting. By obtaining the spin precession frequency from fits to the TRFR oscillations, one can convert the frequency into an effective magnetic field. After taking data at many magnetic fields, we see that the nuclear field adds to the applied field for MnAs/GaAs, whereas it opposes the applied field for Fe/GaAs. This is most noticeable at ~0.8T where the nuclear and applied fields cancel and spin precession stops.

Time-resolved spin measurements and magnetic field sweeps in Fe/GaAs and MnAs/GaAs ferromagnetic diode structures. The figure shows Faraday rotation maps, hysteresis behavior, and nuclear magnetic field effects during spin injection experiments.

By processing these structures into Schottky diodes, one finds that the bias voltage has a strong impact on the nuclear polarization and the electron spin dynamics. For the Fe/GaAs device, the nuclear field can be tuned over many orders of magnitude with a few volts bias. At -1.7 V, the nuclear and applied fields cancel, halting spin precession. At +1.5 V the nuclear field is about 16 times larger than the applied field. The MnAs device shows similar behavior but the nuclear and applied fields are parallel.

Device schematics and spin dynamics data for electrically biased Fe/GaAs and MnAs/GaAs ferromagnetic diode structures. The plots show voltage-dependent spin precession and spin polarization behavior measured through time-resolved optical techniques.

Comparison of the electrical characteristics of the MnAs/n-GaAs device reveals a connection between the diode turn-on and the onset of nuclear spin polarization. Below we plot the diode's current-voltage curves and the total magnetic field obtained from TRFR data at each voltage. The diode turns on at nearly the same voltage as the nuclear polarization, suggesting that band bending near the MnAs/GaAs interface strongly influences this spin polarization mechanism.

Current-voltage and effective magnetic field measurements for an MnAs/GaAs ferromagnetic diode at low temperature. The graph compares device response with and without optical excitation, showing voltage-controlled nuclear spin polarization effects.

Recalling that it is spontaneously polarized electrons that cause the nuclear polarization, the diagrams below depict how the Schottky barrier could influence the degree of electron spin polarization. At zero bias, electrons are swept away from the ferromagnet, which would reduce their interaction with it. At positive voltages, the band flattens allowing carriers to access the interface and interact with the ferromagnet.

Energy band diagrams illustrating carrier behavior in a GaAs ferromagnetic diode under zero bias and positive applied voltage. The schematics show electron transport and band alignment changes across the semiconductor-ferromagnet interface.

For more information on these experiments please see the following publications.

  • "Ferromagnetic Imprinting of Nuclear Spins in Semiconductors", R. K. Kawakami, Y. Kato, M. Hanson, I. Malajovich, J. M. Stephens, E. Johnston-Halperin, G. Salis, A. C. Gossard, and D. D. Awschalom, Science 294, 131 (2001).
  • 'Spontaneous spin coherence in n-GaAs produced by ferromagnetic proximity polarization", R. J. Epstein, I. Malajovich, R. K. Kawakami, Y. Chye, M. Hanson, P. M. Petroff, A. C. Gossard, and D. D. Awschalom, Phys. Rev. B 65, 121202(R) (2002).
  • "Voltage control of nuclear spins in ferromagnetic Schottky diodes", R. J. Epstein, J. Stephens, M. Hanson, Y. Chye, A. C. Gossard, P. M. Petroff, and D. D. Awschalom, Phys. Rev. B 68, 41305(R) (2003).
  • Research Index